- 主页
- /
- 总第五十三期(2024年6月)
山道期刊
总第五十三期(2024年6月)
主题: | 神学研究的跨科整合 包括专题文章六篇、讨论文章两篇及书评五篇 |
页数: | viii+252 |
售价: | HK$100 |
编者的话 | 点击查阅 | |
专题文章 | ||
黄福光 | 跨学科的圣经研究:应用与滥用 | Abstract |
谢品然 | 圣经神学、脑神经神学、人工生成智能:一个跨科际整合的圣经与神学研究探索 | Abstract |
张楷弦 | 天启保罗观与跨领域研究带来的新发展:社会科学方法与认知语言学方法 | Abstract |
洪亮 | 超人类主义的「形态自由」概念——从人类「脆弱性」的角度看 | Abstract |
赖品超 | 超越与自我超越:从后现代哲学到儒耶对话 | Abstract |
佘枝凤 | 克服障碍:对堂会领袖灵修的实践神学省思 | Abstract |
讨论文章 | ||
戴浩辉 | 旧约中的贫与富(二):先知文学、智慧传统、诗篇 | Abstract |
彭昱森 | 恩典与人工:金口约翰论圣经默示 | Abstract |
编者的话
黄福光
本期《山道期刊》的专题是「神学研究的跨学科整合」。如何用六篇文章的篇幅好好论述这个大题目,实在是一项挑战。尽管如此,今期收录的文章涵盖了多个方面,可以让读者稍稍了解这个领域。
第一篇文章〈跨学科的圣经研究:应用与滥用〉由笔者撰写,讨论圣经研究里关于跨学科研究的一些应用和滥用。简单地说,尽管研究圣经时可以借用其他学科的帮助,而这样做也由来已久,但这并不意味着所有跨学科的圣经研究都必定是有用的、有意思的,甚或不一定做得恰当。此外,既同时运用两个学科,就必须解决两者孰轻孰重的优先顺序问题。文章通过多个例子(诸如圣经研究如何结合考古学、科学、其他文本传统等)来说明这些重点。
谢品然的〈圣经神学、脑神经神学、人工生成智能:一个跨科际整合的圣经与神学研究探索〉向读者简述脑神经科学、人工智能等前沿科学所带来的冲击和挑战。文章主要介绍这些领域,并指出圣经神学该如何看待它们,该提出什么信息。这场讨论才刚刚开始;对于将这些学科纳入圣经及神学研究,作者持开放的态度,并且表示欢迎。
张楷弦的〈天启保罗观与跨领域研究带来的新发展:社会科学方法与认知语言学方法〉相对来说较为「传统」,涉及整合圣经研究和认知语言学。作者采用认知语言学方法,分析保罗关于基督事件和复活的隐喻,从而展示这些隐喻如何有助于建立一个有别于当代社会的社群。
洪亮的〈超人类主义的「形态自由」概念——从人类「脆弱性」的角度看〉又带领读者来到一般信徒比较陌生的领域,这次是探讨超人类主义与神学的关系。文章的焦点是探讨人类的「脆弱性」作为增强人类构造和能力的原因。作者认为,评估这类想法不应局限于创造论的角度,还应该包括基督中心的人论。正如谢品然一样,洪亮对这个议题持谨慎而开放的态度。
赖品超的〈超越与自我超越:从后现代哲学到儒耶对话〉也是一篇关于神学的文章,却是相对比较「传统」,因为是与东方和西方的哲学对话。这篇文章的焦点是超越和自我超越,作者精彩地列举了学术界对这议题的各种观点。他总结认为这类神学研究的跨科整合应该加以鼓励,因为它可以丰富我们对有关课题的理解。
最后一篇专题文章是佘枝凤的〈克服障碍:对堂会领袖灵修的实践神学省思〉。它与其他文章不同,涉及的是实践问题,即个人灵修的实践。作者先指出造成堂会领袖实践灵修困难的一些原因(例如忙碌、错误的圣洁观念),然后作出评估,最后提出一些建议来解决这些问题。
除了专题文章,本期还有两篇讨论文章。第一篇是戴浩辉的〈旧约中的贫与富(二):先知文学、智慧传统、诗篇〉,这是他上一期文章的续篇。作者延续对旧约中贫与富问题的研究,在先知文学、智慧传统和诗篇中继续探讨这个问题。文章剖析这些资料所代表的信仰理念,以及从中给现代人带来的规范性提醒。
第二篇是彭昱森的〈恩典与人工:金口约翰论圣经默示〉,谈论圣经默示过程中神和人的因素。据作者的分析,金口约翰既非常重视圣灵在圣经写作中的工作,也强调人类作者在其中的角色,且表明人类作者期间并非处于迷狂状态。然而,金口约翰对圣经默示机制的看法却不明确,我们也无法从中得出明确的结论。
最后,今期还有五篇书评,涉及门徒观、天启保罗观、教会论、五旬节派神学、教会如何牧养自闭症人士等等,内容丰富,涉猎广泛,读者可从中获益,拓宽视野。
Some Uses and Abuses of Interdisciplinary Research in Biblical Studies
WONG Fook Kong
The purpose of this essay is to discuss some uses and abuses of cross-disciplinary studies. Firstly, the external information included must be reliable, eg, one must distinguish popular archaeology from real archaeology. Secondly, even when the external sources are reliable, we have to be aware that there is a possibility they contradict the Bible rather than help us understand the Bible. This is an inevitable part of scholarship; it is a double-edged sword that cuts both ways. Even when external information challenges our faith, we must not alter it to conform to our view. It must be kept true and independent to serve its purpose. Furthermore, cross-disciplinary studies involve more than one source of information that inevitably compete for authority. There is no hard and fast rule as to how this should be handled but it must be done well to achieve the most benefits. Finally, by adding outside information to the “gaps” in the biblical text, we may come up with new insights or readings. However, the validity of the addition and the resulting interpretation must also be assessed critically. Just because we can does not mean it is valid or helpful.
Biblical Theology, Neurotheology, and AI/AGI/HAI/BCI: A Challenge from Interdisciplinary Integration for Biblical and Theological Studies
Philip P. CHIA
Interdisciplinary studies are in fashion again, though this round is very different from that of last century due to the “lightspeed” advancement in science and technology that has transformed the everyday lives of humanity on a global scale. This essay employs elements of biblical theology for its engagement in the development of neuroscience and artificial intelligence technology. It begins with a brief description of interdisciplinary studies, followed by a brief introduction and some updates on neuroscience development and its implications for the construing of neurotheology. Then it explores the latest development of artificial intelligence and its implications for human society and everyday living, which pose challenges to the (re)understanding and (re)constitution of the knowledge of God as Creator and humans as created beings and co-creators, as well as the role of human beings within the world of human creation as it relates to the divine God. The essay highlights the pivotal role that wisdom theology plays within the enterprise of biblical theology, linking wisdom theology with the theological concept of creation and the personification of Lady “Wisdom,” especially its role as the architect-engineer in “creation” (Prv 8:30). There is much room for interdisciplinary studies and integration of biblical theology, neurotheology, and artificial intelligence, in particular the neuroscience and AI-technology advancements that advance our current understanding of human neuro-circuits in brain study and nano-chip semi-conductors enhanced machine learning AI technology. These advancements have seriously challenged the role, purpose, and responsibility of human beings as not only created beings but also co-creators in all human advancement since the Genesis creation. All these fall within the concern of “wisdom,” leading to the (re)formulation and transformation of biblical and theological understanding of us as created creatures by the divine Creator, as well as the God-Creation/Cosmos -Human relationship.
Apocalyptic Paul and Insights from Interdisciplinary Studies: Social-Scientific Approaches and Cognitive Linguistic Approaches
Kai-hsuan CHANG
The application of interdisciplinary studies to the New Testament texts has become a significant trend in the field. This has especially been the case within Pauline Studies in the last fifty years. In this paper, I review the way in which the development of recent perspectives on Paul has been influenced by social-scientific approaches. In so doing, I indicate not only the confluence of social-scientific approaches and the New Perspective on Paul but also a significant turn in the interpretations of the Apocalyptic Paul caused by the applications of sociological theories . In the light of these approaches, the Paul in the understanding of the Apocalyptic camp, just like the Paul as interpreted by the New Perspective camp, also builds up an alternative community that arises within the existing social structure. However, I argue that, while this sociological turn in the Apocalyptic camp has been helpful, there is an unresolved gap between the sociological description of Paul and his community on the one hand and the apocalyptic understanding of Paul's theology on the other. Specifically, interpreting within the framework of the Apocalyptic Paul, how do we understand God's apocalyptic intervention in Christ and describe the process by which this apocalyptic event could be delivered to transform a social reality in history and build up an alternative community? My proposal is that cognitive linguistics is capable of dealing with the cognitive process within the human mind by which some complex and innovative ideas can be created through metaphorical expressions on the basis of simple and concrete experiences. I will apply cognitive linguistic tools to Paul's metaphorical expressions about the Christ event and resurrection, and demonstrate how these metaphors can contribute to the building of an alternative community.
The Morphological Freedom of Transhumanism: From the Perspective of Human Vulnerability
HONG Liang
This paper examines the concept of morphological freedom of transhumanism, starting from discussing the issue of human vulnerability in current theological anthropological studies, and then revealing the inherently problematic nature of morphological freedom through the lens of human vulnerability. This article argues that theological discussions based on human vulnerability should not be limited to the doctrine of creation, but should adopt a Christocentric anthropology to launch a theological religious critique of transhumanism's claim of “non-vulnerability.”
Transcendence and Self-Transcendence: From Post-Modern Philosophy to Christian-Confucian Dialogue
LAI Pan Chiu
This study aims to address the issue concerning whether and how philosophy as a discipline is to be related to theological studies by exploring the relevance of post-modern philosophy to Christian-Confucian dialogue. It takes Merold Westphal's discussion concerning transcendence and self-transcendence as the starting point and highlights his interpretation of transcendence in terms of otherness or alterity in post-modern philosophy. It then argues that Westphal's concepts of ontological and epistemological transcendence, covering the positions of Martin Heidegger, Baruch Spinoza, GWF Hegel, Pseudo-Dionysius, Thomas Aquinas, and Karl Barth, can enhance the mutual understanding between Christianity and Confucianism, particularly their respective positions on divine transcendence, including the Confucian concept of unity between Heaven and humanity. These concepts can clarify the misunderstandings that “transcendence” and “immanence” are contradictory and that the Christian God is “externally transcendent” without “immanence.”
Regarding self-transcendence, Westphal employs the concepts of ethical and religious transcendence to discuss Emmanuel Levinas and Søren Kierkegaard, focusing on their understandings of ethical responsibility, human finitude, existential anxiety, and sinfulness. From the perspective of Christian-Confucian dialogue, self- transcendence, no matter whether it is called ethical or religious transcendence, should cover some other topics such as self-transformation, theosis, and unity between Heaven and humanity. Some of these topics can be found in the writings of Aquinas, Barth, and Pseudo -Dionysius. The relevance of Pseudo-Dionysius, including his/her understanding of self-transcendence in terms of eros, ecstasy, etc., to post-modern philosophy, was explored by various scholars, including particularly Christos Yannaras. This study further clarifies that Pseudo-Dionysius's approach to divine transcendence in terms of otherness and to self-transcendence in terms of unity between divinity and humanity was based on his/her Christology, especially the two-nature Christology of Chalcedon formula, which endeavored to balance the distinction or otherness as well as the unity between the divine and human natures. In contrast, Westphal's interpretation of self-transcendence is rather limited and may reflect the one-sidedness of the post-modern emphasis on otherness or alterity.
This limitation of post-modern philosophy should encourage rather than discourage the Christian theological dialogue with many other academic disciplines, which can also enrich its dialogue with Confucianism as well as its discussion concerning transcendence or self-transcendence. Furthermore, Christian theological participation in inter- disciplinary research or dialogue with other religions needs not to neglect its own distinctive Christological perspective, which may enrich rather than obstruct the dialogue.
Overcoming Obstacles: A Practical Theological Reflection on Daily Devotion of Congregation Leaders
SHEA Chi Fung
This article is an exploration of a palpable but rarely discussed discrepancy between belief and practice. Most Chinese evangelicals recognize the importance of daily devotion, but probably not many establish this habit successfully. This phenomenon could easily be looked upon as personal failure, ranging from poor spiritual health to slothfulness. If this happens to congregation leaders, it would be even more difficult for them to talk about it. This study is an attempt to break this silence. The experiences of daily devotion of Chinese evangelical congregation leaders are explored through the approach of practical theological interpretation. There are three significant findings. Firstly, the action research study confirmed that the subjects did encounter multiple obstacles in their practices of daily devotion, but they were not necessarily trapped. The key lies in how they dealt with these obstacles. By merely blaming oneself while keeping silent about the predicament, one would easily fall into helplessness. Alternatively, by seeking help and receiving appropriate support, such as spiritual companioning, one would be more likely to be empowered to overcome the obstacles with courage. Secondly, their choices might have been shaped on the one hand by the conception of sanctification they inherited from evangelicalism and, on the other hand, by the contemporary culture of busyness. Thirdly, to resist the false image of holiness permeated by the culture of busyness, the author recommends congregations undertake an in-depth restoration of the ministry of spiritual formation. This includes developing a concept of sanctification with Christian perfection as its end, a theory of spiritual growth rooted in Christian tradition, and knowledge of spiritual discernment that is able to inform the ministry of spiritual companioning.
Wealth and Poverty in the Old Testament (II): Prophets, Wisdom, and Psalms
TAI Ho-Fai Nicholas
This is the second part of the article titled “Wealth and Poverty in the Old Testament.” It examines what the prophetic literature, wisdom traditions, and the Psalter say about wealth and poverty, what beliefs these materials represent, and what kind of normative reminder they bring to us today.
The prophetic literature was represented mainly by the classical prophets of the eighth century BC, who announced the doom of Israel for their failing to uphold God's justice (mišpāṭ) and righteousness (ṣĕdāqâ). The prophets preached against the injustices of the society and mainly targeted the dignitaries and officials, who through the misuse of economic and administrational power acquired land and wealth at the expense of the poor and the needy. In early wisdom traditions, wealth and poverty were believed to be the result of one's own hard work or laziness, and it seemed that factors like natural and man-made disasters were not considered. This was probably a simplistic conclusion derived from the early small-scale peasant society of Israel. However, in the subsequent monarchical period and the post-exilic era, with the oppression caused by the monarchy or foreign countries, the wisdom tradition then stressed God's retribution in the created order. In accordance with God's justice and righteousness, those who care for the poor are righteous in the created order; on the contrary, those who oppress the poor are evil.
In the Psalter, issues of wealth and poverty are mentioned frequently. Through the Psalms, we can understand that in the Israelites' belief, the rights of the poor, ie, justice and righteousness, must be upheld, for God is the Guarantor of Justice and Righteousness. God executes His justice and righteousness through the king, so that the stability and prosperity given by God can be achieved.
Grace and Human Agency: John Chrysostom on Biblical Inspiration
Raphael Yü-sen PENG
By analyzing John Chrysostom's materials relating to how he describes the divine sources and human elements in the writing of Holy Writ, certain conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, he attaches great importance to the work of the Holy Spirit, who provides very subtle teachings that can be found even in the names, dates, and titles in the Bible. All such details must not be left out at all, or else it may lead to heresies. Furthermore, certain elements of Holy Writ deal with hidden revelations even unknown to angels; it is clear proof of the necessity of Holy Writ. Secondly, he addresses the human authors in various ways, from the broadest generic terms to individual personal names, and he does not spare praise for them. Thirdly, by using the metaphors of string instruments and deacons, John Chrysostom, while reaffirming the dominance of the Holy Spirit, highlights the elevation of the human authors by the Holy Spirit and points out that they are not in a state of ecstasy, thus avoiding the misunderstanding of the Montanists while using the same instrumental metaphor. Since John Chrysostom's expressions are open to interpretations when it comes to the mechanisms of biblical inspiration, conclusions drawn from them cannot be considered definitive, and it is difficult, if not impossible, to reach a holistic conclusion given the corresponding rhetorical contexts that are invariably involved behind John Chrysostom's utterance. It is this ambiguity that allows proponents of both inspiratio rerum and inspiratio verborum to see John Chrysostom as endorsing their respective theories.