,

The Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology of Karl Barth: Response to Dr. Chiu

The Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology of Karl Barth: Response to Dr. Chiu

OU Li-jen

In reading the review to which Dr. Chiu has devoted more than 6,000 words, I have no doubt that Dr. Chiu has shown a careful reading of my book. Although having occasional positive comments about my book, Dr. Chiu's overall evaluation of it is rather negative. Basically in the discussion below I will: (1) respond respectively to what Dr. Chiu has raised regarding my book's “problems” and “contradictions”; (2) argue against Dr. Chiu's sympathy with recent postmodern or non-foundationalist interpretation of Barth.

I will show in this response that the alleged “problems” and “contradictions” in my book actually come from the reviewer's misreading. I will also argue for my position that Barth is a methodologically or formally non-foundationalist but is by no means materially; therefore it is extremely inadequate to label Barth “a postmodern theologian”.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.

Related Posts

,

第五十期 編者的話

Editor's Note When Wong Fuk-kwong published this issue of "Sandow Journal", Hong Kong was under impact: the COVID-19 epidemic was still prevalent, and a large number of people immigrated to other places. In response to these phenomena, the special topic of this issue is "Gathering and Dispersion". There are a total of six special articles in this issue, three of which are in the biblical studies category and three in the practical theology category. ...